- Sponsorship -

Take the Quiz – How Would They Vote?

Here’s a quiz: Given their track record, how do you think Michigan legislators would vote on a bill to lower school property taxes on businesses and homeowners without hurting — and actually benefitting — schools and their ability to serve students?

Would your answer be:

A) Yes
B) No
C) Of course. Are you kidding me?!

The correct answer is B. Legislators since 2002 have consistently voted against legislation to lower the bonding costs of school districts and therefore increase or extend for more years the property taxes levied to pay for school district bonds.

Let me explain.

Four decades ago the Legislature thought it would be a good idea to give school districts a voter-approved financing mechanism to purchase property and pay for building repairs and small improvements on a pay-as-you go basis. Called a “sinking fund,” this tool was intended to give districts an opportunity to maintain their capital investments and infrastructure without tapping their limited operating revenues or require them to pass bond issues and pay interest and fees for relatively small projects.

This legislation, Act 451 of 1976, has been largely unchanged since its passage. In the early 2000s, schools went to the Legislature to ask for a slight change. Technology, they said, was becoming a vital part of their infrastructure and they could envision it being an essential component of school operations well into the future. The problem with funding technology is twofold: It is A) a relatively expensive investment, and B) one that, in many instances, has a short shelf life.

The first legislators to take up the proposal to add technology to the list of allowable uses for a sinking fund thought it was a great idea. It sailed through the Michigan House. And there it stayed. Business interests who had supported the 1994 Proposal A changes to school funding as a way to reduce Michigan’s property tax burden saw this minor change to the sinking fund as a slippery slope. They commissioned a study that projected virtually every district in the state would pass a sinking fund at a cost to Michigan taxpayers of hundreds of millions of dollars.

That didn’t happen. What did happen was that districts began including technology in their bond requests for proposals in the millions of dollars that would be paid over 20, 25 and 30-year periods. All are necessary requests to meet the needs of students and some are absolutely long-term expenditures, just as installing fiber and ensuring a current technology infrastructure in new buildings is an intelligent investment.

Most school leaders would tell you, however, that they’d prefer not to purchase desktop, laptop and tablet computers through a bond issue. Even though those expenditures are segregated for a shorter payoff period within the structure of a bond, the bonding fees and interest payments are expensive.

How expensive? In 2014, Rockford residents supported a bond request that included $25 million for technology and important security improvements. The interest and issuance fees for bonding that $25 million amounted to $4.6 million in additional expense.

In 2013, Forest Hills residents approved $16.8 million in bond dollars for technology, which came with interest and fees of $2.17 million. These are just two examples within Kent ISD. This happens every year in every county across the state, as voters recognize the value of technology to their children’s education and are eager to ensure their children are prepared for a technology-rich environment when they enter the workplace.

Adding technology and security to the allowable uses for sinking funds, as recommended in HB4388 (H-3) would allow communities to support the purchase of the technology and security they desire for their children without bearing the cost of interest and bond fees.

The legislation would do that because a sinking fund allows a district to levy a certain amount of property tax, collect those dollars annually, and spend them as they are collected. No borrowing. No interest. No fees. Sure, there is a property tax cost for sinking funds but it would reduce pressure on districts to seek long-term bonds and, in the long run, the tax burden on property owners would be reduced.

If you would like tosee your district be able to maintain technology and increase the security and safety of their buildings at a lower price to you, the taxpayer, please contact your legislators in the House and the Senate and let them know you support HB4388 (H-3). Tell them you’d appreciate it if they would, too.

- Sponsorship -
Ron Koehler
Ron Koehler
Ron Koehler is the Kent ISD Assistant Superintendent and offers his commentary on issues in education. Read Ron's full bio


Fourth-grade hockey fan gets a magical hour on ice: ‘I made the shot!’

Raised as a Red Wings and Grand Rapids Griffins hockey fan, Jackson Solow lights up while skating on an ice rink wearing his favorite hockey jersey...

‘This time it is continued learning’

One school’s switch from in-person to virtual education last week was nearly seamless, especially when compared with the forced school closure in March...

Foundation grants $28,285 in fall funding requests

Virtual phys ed and art experiences, materials to improve classroom focus and books on social issues aimed at middle-schoolers are among the grants approved this fall...

Latest school closings expand on state-ordered high school mandate

More Kent County districts continue to announce temporary school building closures, as schools contend with a sharp increase in COVID-19 cases in Kent County and Michigan...


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

Have cart, will travel

A Southeast Kelloggsville Elementary music teacher has a new cart for her ukuleles, thanks to her school, her husband and the Kent Career Tech Center...

KCTC and KTC Core students roll up their sleeves to help reduce water runoff at Kent ISD

The water from the Kent ISD area feeds into the Lamberton Creek watershed. The plants will aid in reducing the amount added to the creek...

Essential workers get high school diplomas thanks to state program

Futures for Frontliners offers free community college tuition to essential workers. The program also helps people earn a high-school GED...
- Sponsorship -


Engagement: The Most Important Measure of Student Success

Polls find that students’ engagement in their school work declines as they ascend the grades. Tests that don’t relate to their real-life experiences exacerbate the problem...


Food ‘angels’ support hungry kids through pandemic

They work all across Kent County, guardian angels with peanut butter on their hands and crumbs on their shirtsleeves...
- Sponsorship -


Maranda Where You LiveWGVU